Educational use only — not medical advice. This is a teaching example and must not be used to guide care of any individual patient. Learn more →

Troubleshooting Increased Work of Breathing Seen with Modes Using an Adaptive Targeting Scheme

A sedation-free approach to increased work of breathing on an adaptive mode: raise the tidal-volume target or switch to pressure control.

APVPSVPCMechanicsM2M5⤢ before / after
Problem.In APV, the ventilator adjusts inspiratory pressure to achieve a target tidal volume. When patient effort increases, the distribution of work shifts from the ventilator to the patient (i.e., the more work the patient does to generate tidal volumes, the less work the ventilator has to do). Note here the flattened pressure-time waveform for most inspiration. This is secondary to strong inspiratory effort exerted by the patient, which could be confirmed with inspection at the bedside (the patient had evident increased work of breathing with accessory muscle use). Because this effort causes tidal volumes to exceed the 400 mL target, the ventilator responds by reducing applied pressure above PEEP. Hamilton ventilators will apply as little as 3cmH2O (less than most would use even in a spontaneous breathing trial). Note on the right lower corner under ΔPinsp that the ventilator was only applying the minimum 3 cmH₂O (you ma have to close the legends to see it).
Fix #1

After increasing the target tidal volume from 400 mL to 550 mL, the ventilator is now required to deliver more pressure to meet the higher tidal volume goal. As a result, the inspiratory pressure support has increased (ΔPinsp now 11 cmH₂O instead of 3 cmH₂O). With more support from the ventilator, the patient’s work of breathing decreased as inspected at bedside. Another marker that her respiratory drive decreased is the drop in her RR from 28 in the prior picture to 23 here. This patient did not have ARDS and was intubated for airway protection. Keeping higher tidal volumes, in the range of 8ml/kg of predicted body weight, was therefore thought to be appropriate.

Fix #2

Alternatively, we can switch the patient to Pressure Control. Since we set the amount of pressure given above PEEP (here ΔPcontrol of 12 cmH₂O), work shifting will not occur. The ventilator does not change the amount of work it does in response to patient’s changes in their work of breathing.

Fix #3

When transitioning a patient to Pressure Control (or Pressure Support), it is essential to ensure that the alarm limits are appropriately set since we cannot guarantee a certain tidal volume. Any changes in respiratory system mechanics (e.g., ETT kink) or in patient effort (e.g., after a sedative bolus) may lead to significant drops in tidal volumes. In this example, actual minute volume is 11L/min. Setting a lower limit for the alarm to a value closer to the current minute volume (e.g., 8L/min) will notify us early about a potentially dangerous drop in minute ventilation. Keeping the alarm at 3L/min would be inappropriate, since it could expose the patient to long periods of significant hypoventilation before setting off the alarm.

Fix #4

In this case, we have changed the alarm to 7L/min so it will notify us early about a potentially dangerous drop in minute ventilation.

Preview — work in progress